Mars warns of supply chain job cuts under WTO rules

By Matt Atherton

- Last updated on GMT

Mars global president expected price rises in a WTO trade scenario
Mars global president expected price rises in a WTO trade scenario

Related tags Supply chain International trade

Food manufacturing and other supply chain jobs will be lost and Mars products will become more expensive if Britain trades under World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules post-Brexit, Mars’s global president has claimed, after the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) warned of it opening a “Pandora’s Box of economic consequences”.

Tariffed trade barriers would push Mars’s costs up, and would threaten the supply chain and jobs that came with it, Mars global president Fiona Dawson warned the American Chambers of Commerce to the EU today (March 10).

“The absence of hard borders with all their attendant tariff, customs and non-tariff barriers allows for this integrated supply chain, which helps to keep costs down,” ​Dawson said.

“The return of those barriers would create higher costs which would threaten that supply chain and the jobs that come with it.”

Consumers would inevitably end up paying the price if Prime Minister Theresa May failed to strike an adequate trade deal with the EU, she said.

“If Britain ends up trading with the EU on the basis of WTO rules, ‘Most Favoured Nation’ rates would come into force,” ​Dawson said. “In the area of confectionery, that alone would mean tariffs of around 30%.

‘Higher prices’

“Unfortunately there is no way that those costs could be absorbed without flowing through to consumers in the form of higher prices.”

A return to trade barriers would undermine integrated supply chains, which are crucial to distribution in the food sector, Dawson said.

Dawson’s warning came after CBI president Paul Drechsler claimed that without an EU trade deal, the UK would have to rely on WTO rules. That would “hurt both sides of the Channel”​. Businesses across Europe were concerned about added tariff costs should the UK fail to agree a trade deal, he added.

Drechsler said: “We should be under no illusions about what this would really mean. A ‘no deal’ scenario would open a Pandora’s Box of economic consequences.

‘Worst-case scenario’

“Firms are worried about this ‘worst-case scenario’. Some are getting ready for it to reduce economic damage, but in reality many firms can’t prepare because the cost of change is simply too high to even consider it.”

Both Drechsler and Dawson believed agreeing a deal that worked in everyone’s best interest was the way forward.

“An ambitious, comprehensive deal covering every sector is what’s best for Britain, it’s what’s best for Europe and we’ll do everything we can to get it,”​ Drechsler said.

Theresa May outlined her 12-point Brexit plan​ in January. See the box below for more.

Meanwhile, last month fellow confectionery firm Mondelēz International blamed Brexit​ for its £2.9bn drop in last year’s revenue.

The government's 12 Brexit principles

  1. Providing certainty and clarity
  2. Taking control of our own laws
  3. Strengthening the union
  4. Protecting our strong historic ties with Ireland and maintaining the Common Travel Area
  5. Controlling immigration
  6. Securing rights for EU nationals in the UK and UK nationals in the EU
  7. Protecting workers’ rights
  8. Ensuring free trade with European markets
  9. Securing new trade agreements with other countries
  10. Ensuring the UK remains the best place for science and innovation
  11. Cooperating in the fight against crime and terrorism
  12. Delivering a smooth and orderly exit from the EU

Source: ‘The UK’s exit from and a new partnership with the European Union’

Related topics Confectionery Services

Related news

Show more

Related products

Carbon Reduction for Large Energy Users

Carbon Reduction for Large Energy Users

Content provided by ESB Energy | 12-Nov-2021 | Product Brochure

ESB Energy Business Solutions can help you meet your companies carbon targets by 2050. We offer a range of sustainable tailored solutions to reduce the...

Related suppliers

1 comment

In whose benefit is this Mars speech?

Posted by Richard Shipperbottom,

Setting aside the pure speculation on what tariffs we might end up with, perhaps the hard pressed consumers Fiona refers to may simply decide that they can do without a 30% more expensive (or smaller) Mars bar. Ask Mondelez how that went for them.
Perhaps instead look at an alternative approach to the supply chain.

Report abuse

Follow us

Featured Jobs

View more

Webinars

PRODUCTS & SERVICES