Opinion

Are gluten-free diets harmful for non-coeliacs?

Professor Buttriss: ‘Is mainstream adoption supported by the evidence?’

Gluten – a protein found in wheat, rye and barley – is recognised to cause well-documented adverse clinical effects in people with coeliac disease.

In these individuals, the gluten triggers inflammation and damage to the lining of the small intestine, and the treatment is strict gluten avoidance.

There is also a less defined entity (non-coeliac gluten sensitivity) for which the biological basis is uncertain.

Gluten-free foods have become trendy

Originally developed specifically for coeliacs, gluten-free foods have become trendy among sections of the wider population, thanks in part to celebrity endorsement.

But is mainstream adoption of gluten-free supported by the evidence?

A paper in The BMJ advises that promotion of gluten-free diets among people without coeliac disease should not be encouraged because avoidance of gluten may result in reduced consumption of beneficial wholegrains.

Associated with lower cardiovascular risk

These, and wholemeal products made from them, are associated with lower cardiovascular risk.

This advice follows analysis of the link between gluten and heart disease incidence in 100,000 American health professionals over 25 years.

The finding suggests a need for caution and more research to check whether the relationship can be replicated.

  • Judy Buttriss is director general of the British Nutrition Foundation

Related News

©iStock

Gluten-free products ‘not as healthy’ as conventional

Professor Buttriss: ‘The challenge has been to find substitutes that provide the same functionality in food production’

Sat fat replacement research ramps up

Buttriss: ‘Bigger, high quality trials are needed and now underway’

Can turmeric really help cure cancer?

Professor Buttriss: ‘Purchases of fruit and vegetables have continued to decline’

Family Food survey reveals fruit and veg decline

Professor Buttriss: ‘Resistant starch is naturally present in some foods’

Evidence for benefits of resistant starch is growing

Professor Buttriss: ‘Sugar intakes are deemed too high’

Sugar reduction aims thwarted by sweetener confusion

Related Products

See more related products

Comments (1)

Anna Jacobs - 28 Jul 2017 | 06:22

non-beneficial wholegrains

For those of us who are now described as non-coeliac gluten sensitives, whole grains are the opposite of beneficial. So severely do they affect me that if inadvertently eaten eg in restaurants which assure me there's no wheat or corn in their food, they give me atrial flutter. This is a 95% correlation of cause and effect, and the only time it was something else, I had pneumonia and was coughing severely. So I wish instead of telling us not to give up wholegrains, scientists would find us some alternatives. I eat as varied and nutritious a diet as I can, given several food intolerances - and take the emergency pill provided by my cardiologist if something in the food inadvertently triggers another episode. To hear some journalists rant on, you'd think I was merely being fussy! I wish!

28-Jul-2017 at 18:22 GMT

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.